Legal Opinion

Toyota Motor Sales, Inc. v. Farr

District Court, S.D. Mississippi

Decided November 6, 2003No. Civ.A. 4:02 CV 312LNPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

LEE, District Judge.

This cause is before the court on the motion of plaintiffs Toyota Motor Sales, Inc. and Toyota Motor Corporation (collectively Toyota) for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendants Michael Derek Farr and Sharon Farr Burt have responded in opposition to the motion and the court, having considered the memoran-da of authorities, together with attachments, submitted by the parties, concludes that the motion should be granted.

The following facts are not in dispute. On November 20, 1996, Michael Derek…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lanier v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Thomas v. BaileyMississippi Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Refinery Holding Co. v. TRMI Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  4. Hunt v. CokerCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 1999
  5. Taranto Amusement Co. v. MITCHELL ASSOC. INC.Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Guardianship of LaneMississippi Supreme Court · 2008
  2. William Bush v. Brandy LaneMississippi Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API