Legal Opinion
Chaney v. Mullis
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided October 15, 1913No. 7,891PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Prom Monroe Circuit Court; James B. Wilson, Judge. Action between James Chaney and Clint Mullís wherein James Chaney appeals from an adverse judgment.
1Opinion of the CourtLairy, J.
1. The only error assigned is, that the court erred in overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial. The brief of appellant does not set out a copy of this motion or state its substance, and there is no reference in the brief to the record indicating where such motion *234may be found. It is the duty of appellant to point out error and tbe court will not search the record to reverse.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Note.—Reported, in 102 N. E. 872. See, also, 2 Cyc. 1014; 3 Cyc. 419.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Jann v. Standard Cement Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1913
3Cited by2 opinions
- Jann v. Standard Cement Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1913
- Henderson v. Country Publishing Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1914