Legal Opinion

Application of Nort

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1980No. 12143PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Petitioner seeks waiver of SCR 51(3), which requires that an applicant for examination for a license to practice as an attorney in this state “[h]ave received a degree of bachelor of laws, or an equivalent law degree, from a law school approved by the committee on legal education and admissions to the bar of the American Bar Association, and shall present evidence of the same.” The Board of Bar Examiners has opposed the petition.

Petitioner concedes that he has not met the requirements of this rule, but urges the court to grant him a waiver, particularly referring us to Brown v. Supreme…

3Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners of NMSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Goldfarb v. Virginia State BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Dent v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  4. In Re GriffithsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Leis v. FlyntSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by8 opinions

  1. State Bar of Nevada v. ClaiborneNevada Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Román Vargas v. Tribunal Examinador de Médicos de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1985
  3. Lucas v. Maine Commission of PharmacySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
  4. Bennett v. State Bar of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 1987
  5. In re MacartneyArizona Supreme Court · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API