Legal Opinion

AUSTIN COHEN v. CHASE BANK; EXPERIAN; TRANSUNION; EQUIFAX

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided October 6, 2025No. 1:25-cv-04276Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------x AUSTIN COHEN, Plaintiff, ORDER -against- 25-CV-04276 (NRM) (JAM) CHASE BANK; EXPERIAN; TRANSUNION; EQUIFAX, Defendants. -------------------------------------------------x NINA R. MORRISON, United States District Judge. By Order dated August 15, 2025, the Court denied Plaintiff Austin Cohen’s request to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) and granted him fourteen (14) days to pay the $405.00 filing fee. ECF No. 4. Instead, on August 19, 2025, Plaintiff filed a long-form application to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Adkins v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Rosa v. DoeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API