Legal Opinion

WIESART v. Stewart

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided June 5, 2008No. 4403PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOOLSBY, A.J.

Wiesart appeals the trial court’s ruling that S.C.Code Ann. § 23-3-430(14) (Supp.2007) is not retroactive. We reverse.

FACTS

In 1979, a Maryland court convicted Wiesart of indecent exposure after he was caught skinny-dipping with his girlfriend in a hotel pool. Fifteen years later, Wiesart pled guilty in Horry County to a controlled substance offense. He received probation. Wiesart’s probation agent informed him that he was required to register under the sex offender registry pursuant to S.C.Code Ann. § 23-3-430 (Supp.1995) because of the prior indecent exposure conviction.

Prior to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hercules Inc. v. South Carolina Tax CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
  2. South Carolina Department of Revenue v. Rosemary Coin MacHines, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  3. Hazel v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Edwards v. State Law Enforcement DivisionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  2. Barker v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API