Legal Opinion

Haynesworth v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided February 15, 1984No. 82-944PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GALLAGHER, Associate Judge,

Retired:

Following a bench trial in June of 1982, appellant was convicted of taking property without right, D.C.Code § 22-1211 (1981) (repealed December 1982), and simple assault, D.C.Code § 22-504 (1981). Appellant argues that the court’s finding that he was guilty of simple assault is inconsistent with its finding that he was not guilty of possession of a prohibited weapon, D.C.Code § 22-3214(b) (1981). Appellant contends that this asserted inconsistency requires reversal of his simple assault conviction. We affirm.

The government presented evidence that on the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Harris v. RiveraSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. United States v. Joseph MayburyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
  5. United States v. Frank R. West, United States of America v. American Beef Packers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Shell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  2. Price v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  3. Whitaker v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Commonwealth v. GonzalezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  5. Stroman v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API