Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 25, 1931No. 13979PublishedCited by 7 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

LATTIMORE, Judge.

— Conviction for possessing intoxicating liquor for purposes of sale; punishment, one year in the penitentiary.

This case must be reversed for the following reasons: First, the trial court told the jury in his charge that the possession of more than a quart of intoxicating liquor was prima facie evidence that same was possessed for the purpose of sale, but failed to define what was meant by prima facie evidence. The failure was excepted it. Caldwell v. State, 101 Texas Crim. Rep., 76, 273 S. W., 608; Ayres v. State, 21 Texas App., 399, 17 S. W., 253.

The court erred in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ayres v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1886
  2. Caldwell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. White v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
  2. Combs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1941
  3. Monroe v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1933
  4. Whitaker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1957
  5. Sirman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API