Legal Opinion

Port Terminal RR Ass'n v. Richardson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 14, 1991No. C14-89-1176-CVPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAUL PRESSLER, Justice.

The plaintiff below recovered for injuries arising from a collision between an automobile and a train at a railroad crossing. Appellant raises thirteen points of error and appellees raise one cross-point. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

The decedent, Richard Michael, had been an employee at the Rohm & Haas chemical plant for almost thirty years. Its private roadway connects the plant with Highway 225. This road intersects two parallel sets of railroad tracks north of the entrance gate to the plant. A yellow and black warning disk is posted 825 feet…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Burk Royalty Co. v. WallsTexas Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. LiepeltSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Davis v. City of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Island Recreational Development Corp. v. Republic of Texas Savings Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1986

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. AlexanderTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Greenberg Traurig of New York, P.C. v. Moody, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
  3. Knox v. Taylor, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999
  4. Universal Services Co. v. Huy Hieng Khaov UngTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Phillips v. Super Services Holdings, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2016

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API