Legal Opinion

In re Drose

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 12, 1980No. 21325PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

This disciplinary proceeding is before the Court on a Conditional Admission tendered to the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline pursuant to Rule 28 of the Rules on Disciplinary Procedure. The Executive Commit*415tee of the Board unanimously recommended that the Conditional Admission be accepted and that the sanction of public reprimand be imposed. We concur in the Board’s conclusion that the Conditional Admission should be accepted and a public reprimand be issued.

Respondent admits that he failed to maintain complete and contemporaneous records of all incoming funds of clients.

Resp…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Matter of WhiteSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API