Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Horwitz v. Holabird & Root

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 2004No. 89351 RelPublished

1Opinion of the Court 1

Docket No. 89351–Agenda 31–September 2000.

TEM HORWITZ et al ., Appellees, v. HOLABIRD & ROOT et al ., Appellants.

Opinion Filed May 20, 2004.

2Opinion of the Court · KilbrideJustice Kilbride

Plaintiffs, Tem Horwitz and Horwitz Matthews, Inc. (collectively, Horwitz Matthews), filed a six-count complaint in the circuit court of Cook County against the law firm of Sabo & Zahn (the firm) and its clients, defendants Holabird & Root, Jeffrey Case, Gerald Horn, and James Baird (collectively, Holabird & Root), alleging, inter alia , tortious interference with business relationships. Sabo & Zahn is not involved in this appeal, and only count VI is at…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Purtill v. HessIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Michigan Avenue National Bank v. County of CookIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Gilbert v. Sycamore Municipal HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Espinoza v. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1995

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API