Legal Opinion

Union National Bank v. Forstall

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 15, 1889No. 10,202PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL from the Twenty-second District Court, Parish of St. James. Duffel, J.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Fenner, J.

In 1878, the “ Home Plantation ” belonged in indivisión to Mrs. Eugenie Clioppin and her five children, Fernand Clioppin, Mrs. Robert Dugué, Edward Choppin, Forstall Choppin and Louis H. Chopx>in. The throe last were minors under the tutorship of their said mother.

On March 14th, 1878, Mrs. Choppin and her two major children, Fernand and Mrs. Dugué, acting solely in their individual capacities, executed certain promissory notes secured by an act of mortgage. The act recites that the parties aforesaid “are indebted unto Charles W. Cam-mack in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cragin v. LovellSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Falk v. MoebsSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Daniels v. BurnhamSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1831

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Columbia Finance Corporation v. RobitcheckSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1963
  2. Diaz v. Compania Comercial MexicanaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API