Legal Opinion

State v. Stommel

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 6, 1893PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Mahasha District Court. — Hon. A. E. Dewey, Judge. This appeal is by H. M. Yan Yliet and Eobert Milner, sureties for the defendant on his appeal to this court, from an order overruling their motion to be released and exonerated as such sureties, because of having surrendered the defendant to the custody of the sheriff, as provided in section 1593 of the Code.

1Opinion of the CourtG-iven, J.

The judgment from which Stommel appealed was that he pay a fine of six hundred dollars. Section 4587 of the Code provides: “After conviction, upon an appeal to the supreme court the defendant must be admitted to bail as follows: If the appeal be from a judgment imposing a fine, upon the undertaking of bail that he will pay the same, or such part of it as *68the supreme court may direct, and in all respects abide the orders and the judgment of the supreme court upon the appeal.” Said section further provides the condition of the undertaking on an appeal from a judgment of imprisonment. The…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Van Buren County v. BradfordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  3. State v. CrosserSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API