Legal Opinion

School District No. 9 v. Dickson Consolidated School Dist. No. 77

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 28, 1937No. 27653PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.

The question for decision in this ease is whether qualified electors of a school district signing a petition asking the county superintendent to attach that school district to an adjoining consolidated district can, 'after the petition is approved by the county superintendent and an appeal is lodged in the county court, withdraw their names from such petition as a matter of right. The case arose under the following circumstances: A petition signed by a majority of the qualified electors of school district No. 9 of Carter county, requesting the county superintendent to attach said district to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mercersburg Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  2. School District No. 24 of Custer Co. v. RenickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. State ex rel. Tanner v. WarrickNebraska Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Mills v. LynchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  5. Valley Center School District No. 20 v. HansbergerArizona Supreme Court · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Warren School District ElectionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  2. In Re Alteration of School District Boundaries of District No. 42 & Consolidated No. 41Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API