Legal Opinion

Humphrey v. Bailey

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 29, 1933No. 1195PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*2OPINION

- By HORNBECK, PJ.

It is obvious from a statement of the foregoing facts that there is a variance among officers who had connection with the bill of exceptions in this case.

As the record unexplained stands we are required to take the certificate of the clerk of courts as appearing in the transcript of the docket and journal entries which the law provides shall be prepared and filed in this court. In addition to this we have the certificate of the trial judge supporting the dates as appearing in the transcript.

So that there might be no source of information left uninvestigated, upon our…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jefferis v. NeversOhio Court of Appeals · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API