Legal Opinion

State v. Hopson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 11, 2008No. 03CR0270, A126720PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

Defendant was convicted of first-degree sodomy, ORS 163.405, and first-degree kidnapping, ORS 163.235. At sentencing, the court determined that, under Blakely v. Washington, 542 US 296, 124 S Ct 2531, 159 L Ed 2d 403 (2004), and Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 US 466, 120 S Ct 2348, 147 L Ed 2d 435 (2000), it could not make factual findings in support of consecutive sentences, ORS 137.123, but that it could make factual findings in support of a sexually violent dangerous offender sentence, under ORS 137.767, on the sodomy conviction. Defendant appealed, arguing that the court erred in imposing a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Blanton v. City of North Las VegasSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. United States v. NachtigalSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. State v. IceOregon Supreme Court · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jones v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  2. State v. HopsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API