Legal Opinion

Ovington v. Aetna Indemnity Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1904No. 4921PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Hatch, J., entered July 24, 1903, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action upon an indemnity bond.

1Opinion of the Court

Fullerton, C. J. —

In May 1902 the respondents entered into a contract in writing with one B. Coiling, by the terms of which Colling agreed to furnish all of the necessary labor and material, and erect, for the respondents, a dwelling house, according to plans and specifications therein specially mentioned and described. The consideration for the construction of the building was $3,300. The contract also provided that Colling should furnish a bond in the sum of $2,000, to secure the faithful performance of the contract on his part. Following out this requirement of the contract, the contractor…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Beebe v. RedwardWashington Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Knight & Jillson Co. v. CastleIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Sheard v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Denny v. SpurrWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Columbia Security Co. v. Aetna Accident & Liability Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Ætna Indemnity Co. v. Town of ComerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API