Legal Opinion

Continental Casualty Co. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 9, 1985No. 83—2999PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McNAMARA

Plaintiff Continental Casualty Company brought this action seeking a declaration that an excess indemnity policy of insurance issued by Continental to the Kellwood Company did not provide coverage pursuant to a vendor’s endorsement to Sears, Roebuck and Company. After Sears filed an answer and counterclaim, the trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Sears as to Continental’s complaint and as to count I of Sears’ counterclaim, which sought a finding that Sears was covered pursuant to the policy.

Sears was a purchaser of tents from Kellwood, a tent manufacturer. Kellwood obtained…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Employers Ins. of WausauDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dominick's Finer Foods, Inc. v. American Manufacturers Mutual InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API