Legal Opinion

Chalmers v. Gumm

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 1941No. 7611PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Judge Hickman

delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section A.

Defendant in error, Charles A. Gumm, alleging himself to be “a nephew and heir at law of Fred Erichson” brought this action in the County Court of Harris County to set aside the probate of the will of Fred Erichson, deceased. The alleged grounds for. setting aside the will and the probate thereof, were: First, lack of testamentary capacity, and, second, undue influence exercised upon the testator by certain persons named as beneficiaries in the will. A trial of the case in the county court resulted in a judgment…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McAfee v. Travis Gas Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Abrams v. Ross' EstateTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  3. Leatherwood v. StephensTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930
  4. St. Mary's Orphan Asylum v. MastersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
  5. Pena Y Vidaurri's Estate v. BruniCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Womble v. AtkinsTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Fischer v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Turcotte v. TrevinoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  4. Barrows v. EzerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  5. A & W INDUSTRIES, INC. v. DayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1998

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API