Legal Opinion

Pickering v. Young

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 9, 1933PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.

The residuary clause of the will of Frances C. Sparhawk was as follows: “The remainder of my estate *293— excluding articles named in the unattested list — after the Executor shall have paid all expenses, I give to my cousin, Abby R. Loring, one half to be used for her brother, E. James Loring. Or should I survive her, the money willed to her is to be given” to the “Massachusetts Medical Benevolent Society.” The disposition of the articles named in the unattested list, which the executor was directed to distribute to persons named in that list, is not now in question. That list dealt with a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Worcester Trust Co. v. TurnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  2. Bramley v. WhiteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  3. Shattuck v. WallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
  4. Slattery v. WasonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
  5. Johnson v. JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Harrison v. StevensMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  2. Old Colony Trust Co. v. KennardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API