Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Bradley

Dauphin County Court of Quarter Sessions

Decided December 14, 1932No. 356Published

1Opinion of the Court

Fox, J.,

— We have before us a motion for a new trial based upon the following reasons:

“1. The verdict is against the law.
“2. The verdict is against the evidence.
“3. The verdict is against the weight of the evidence.
“4. The Commonwealth failed to prove the falsity of the matter on which the perjury was assigned by the testimony of a credible witness and corroborative evidence aliunde which tended to show the perjury independent of any declaration or admission of the defendant and the person to be corroborated.
“5. The Commonwealth failed to prove any facts tending to show the falsity of the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Williams v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880
  2. State v. HillSupreme Court of Missouri · 1886
  3. Peterson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  4. State v. HunterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1904
  5. Hereford v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1902

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API