Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 12, 1990No. 89-184PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NIMMONS, Judge.

Reynolds appeals from his conviction of the offense of possession of cocaine, asserting reversible error in the jury selection process by reason of the state’s excusing a black juror peremptorily. We affirm.

The trial court employed a jury selection method whereby 17 men and women were randomly called forward from a larger pool. Among the 17 was one black, Ms. Dean, who was the twelfth person called forward. The trial judge initially elicited some basic personal information from the 17 after which each attorney was allowed to question them. Thereafter, the trial judge…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. NeilSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  2. State v. SlappySupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  3. Pearson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  4. Parrish v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  5. Jennings v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  2. State v. WilliamsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  3. McAroy v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API