Legal Opinion

Bank of Commerce & Trust Co. v. McCabe

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1932PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKinney

The bill herein was filed to recover certain taxes paid under protest exactéd by the Commissioner of Finance and Taxation under the Hall Income Tax Law, chapter 86, Acts of 1929. The Chancellor granted the relief prayed for, and the Commissioner has appealed and assigned the decree of the Chancellor for error.

The complainant is a Tennessee corporation, with its situs at Memphis. It is the duly appointed and qualified guardian and trustee of certain nonresident minors and beneficiaries, and as such received certain incomes on stocks-and bonds, on which taxes were paid as stated above. There is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gould v. GouldSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. United States v. MerriamSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Crocker v. MalleySupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  4. Smietanka, Collector of Internal Revenue v. First Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. State ex rel. Stewart v. Louisville & N. R.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Memphis Street Railway v. CrenshawTennessee Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Ross v. McCabeTennessee Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Union Planters Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. BeelerTennessee Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Templeton v. BartlettTennessee Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Sanborn v. McCanlessTennessee Supreme Court · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API