Legal Opinion
Woodruff v. North Bloomfield Gravel Mining Co.
United States Circuit Court
Decided April 9, 1883PublishedCited by 20 opinions
In Equity.
1Opinion of the CourtSawyer, J.
This is a bill brought against a number of hydraulic mining companies, severally owning mines at various points on the Yuba river and its tributaries, and working them independently of each other, to restrain them, from discharging the gravel, waste earth, and mining debris arising from working their several mines into the streams.
It is alleged, generally, that complainant has been for 24 years, and that he is now, the owner of an undivided half of three several parcels of land, situated on Feather river, and in the city of Marys-ville, on the Yuba river; that the defendants, severally, own…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Payne v. HookSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Oliver v. PiattSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
- Mississippi & Missouri Railroad v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1863
- The New-York and New Haven R.R. v. . Schuyler, Cross, C.New York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Chipman v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Union Mill & Mining Co. v. DangbergU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1897
- Woodruff v. North Bloomfield Gravel Mining Co.United States Circuit Court · 1884
- Gill v. City of Lake CharlesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1907
- City of New York v. A-1 Jewelry & Pawn, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2007
- Ladew v. Tennessee Copper Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Tennessee · 1910
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.