Legal Opinion

Sissenguth v. Bourne

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 16, 1915No. 8,520PublishedCited by 1 opinion

From Superior Court of Marion County (79,787); Clarence E. Weir, Judge. Action by Flora Bourne against Dietrich Sissenguth and another. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant named appeals.

1Per curiam

1. This is an appeal from a judgment for malicious prosecution in favor of appellee, Flora Bourne, against appellant. Two errors are assigned. The first questions the sufficiency of the complaint on the ground that the city court of Indianapolis in which appellee was prosecuted for petit larceny did not have jurisdiction to try and determine the case. The complaint is good as against this objection. §8842 Burns 1914, Acts 1905 p. 236, §216. Cottrell v. Cottrell (1890), 126 Ind. 181, 25 N. E. 905.

2. By the second assignment it is asserted that the court erred in sustaining appellee’s motion to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cottrell v. CottrellIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Fuller & Fuller Co. v. MehlIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. JacobsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. GriswoldIndiana Court of Appeals · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API