Legal Opinion

People v. Moore

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 23, 1969PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBergan, J.

If the development of the rule extending the requirement for corroboration in cases of rape to other crimes be followed closely, it will be seen the extension has been directed in each case to crimes intrinsically related to rape or committed in aid of effecting rape.

Robbery is not such a crime. It is in legal theory and in fact unrelated to rape; and if a woman is robbed while she is also raped, a testimonial disability ought not be added to a physical indignity.

If a man is robbed, his testimony is good enough if it is believed; there is no juridically sound reason why a woman who is robbed…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. FlorioNew York Court of Appeals · 1950

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. FordCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API