Legal Opinion

Norton v. Cheney

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1942No. 7578PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Judge Hickman

delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section A.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

This proceeding had its origin as an action in the nature of a bill of review to set aside all of the orders in a guardianship proceeding in the probate court. On May 7, 1941, by memorandum opinion it was held that, since the record disclosed that land had been sold in the proceeding under orders of the court, the county court was without jurisdiction to entertain the proceeding, and that same should accordingly be dismissed. Our memorandum opinion was based upon an opinion of the court…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pure Oil Co. v. ReeceTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Jones v. ParkerTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Jones v. Sun Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Hermann Hospital Estate v. NachantTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  5. Kelsey v. TrislerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Valdez v. HollenbeckTexas Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Ladehoff v. LadehoffTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Jackson v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  4. Gramercy Insurance Co. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1992
  5. Persky v. GreeverCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API