Legal Opinion

Grossman v. City of Indianapolis

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1909No. 21,455PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Prom Marion Circuit Court (16,837); Charles Bemster, Judge, Suit by Jacob Grossman and others against the City of Indianapolis and others. Prom a judgment for defendants, plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, C. J.

Appellants brought suit to enjoin the enforcement of an ordinance of the city of Indianapolis to license and regulate the business of junk dealers. Appellees’ demurrers to the complaint on the ground of insufficient facts were sustained, and, appellants, declining to amend, final judgment was rendered against them, from which they appealed.

Error is assigned upon the sustaining of appellees’ demurrers to the complaint.

The ordinance is pleaded in full in the complaint, and its provisions, in substance, are: (1) That it shall be unlawful to engage in the business of a junk dealer in said city…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People, Ex Rel. Mason v. . McClaveNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  2. City of Grand Rapids v. BraudyMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Commonwealth v. LeonardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
  4. City of Butte v. PaltrovichMontana Supreme Court · 1904
  5. State v. CohenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1906

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. City of St. Louis v. BaskowitzSupreme Court of Missouri · 1918
  2. Fesler v. BossonIndiana Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Hirth-Krause Co. v. CohenIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Department of Insurance v. Marion Superior CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Shurman v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API