Legal Opinion

Madsen v. Scott

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided July 7, 1998No. 17211PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PICKARD, Judge.

{1} This case requires us to consider under what circumstances a housesitting arrangement will create an employer-employee relationship such that a homeowner may be held vicariously liable for the negligent acts of the housesitter. As a related issue, we consider whether an employee’s failure to act can be an omission occurring within the scope of employment.

{2} Plaintiffs brought suit seeking damages for the injury and wrongful death of their son, Jason Madsen, as the result of a shooting at Shawn Scott’s home. The trial court entered summary judgment on Scott’s motion,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. McCauley v. RayNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Romero v. Mervyn'sNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
  3. California First Bank v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Ford v. Board of County CommissionersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Ruiz v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Madsen v. ScottNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Chavez v. TorresNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Chairez v. James Hamilton Construction Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Chairez v. James Hamilton Construction Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Madsen v. ScottNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API