Legal Opinion
Hochman v. Aronowitz
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 2, 1937PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Plaintiff-appellant was injured by being struck on the head by a brick dropped by the defendant Menzel from a *915chimney which he was demolishing on the premises of the defendant Aronowitíí who was engaged in repairing and constructing an addition to a building. Defendants Hasbrouek and Belmont were independent contractos to perform the labor df 6dHSti‘ti8tÍB.g concrete forms, pouring concrete and doing' carpenter work, Piaitttiff had Worked for the last-mentioned firm two days earlier'm the week of the Saturday on which he WSS injured. He says that Hasbrouek invited him to come to the work…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Young v. New York Central Rail RoadNew York Supreme Court · 1859
- Froehlich v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
- Conrad v. . the New York Central and Hudson River Rd. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1911
- Pliss v. . Erie Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
- Pliss v. Erie RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bein v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- Meyer v. ManzerNew York Supreme Court · 1943