Legal Opinion

O'Rear v. Diaz

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 29, 2024No. 1:24-cv-01669Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK S. O’REAR, Plaintiff, 24 Civ. 1669 (PAE) -v- OPINION & ORDER ARMANDO DIAZ et al., Defendants. PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge: This decision resolves a motion to disqualify defense counsel. Plaintiff S. O’Rear sues her employer Merkley + Partners Inc. (“Merkley”), Merkley’s parent company, Omnicom Group Inc. (“Omnicom”) (collectively, the “corporate defendants”), and individual defendant Armando Diaz. She alleges that Diaz, Merkley’s creative director, sexually assaulted and raped her after a holiday happy hour. She brings federal…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Cresswell v. Sullivan & CromwellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  3. Charles Glueck v. Jonathan Logan, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
  4. Board Of Education Of The City Of New York v. Ewald NyquistCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
  5. Copantitla v. Fiskardo Estiatorio, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API