Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ross v. Sam's Wood Shed Pub, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 17, 1982No. 81-144Published

1DissentSharp, Judge

I dissent in this case because I think there were material conflicting factual issues in the record which made the entry of a summary judgment improper. Gordon v. Hotel Seville, 105 So.2d 175 (Fla. 3d DCA 1958). It is well established that a court, faced with a motion for summary judgment, should accept the facts in a light most favorable to the party against whom the motion is made, resolve all conflicts in that party’s favor and derive all reasonable inferences therefrom. Doll v. Robbins, 303 So.2d 338 (Fla.3d DCA 1974); Wills v. Sears Roebuck & Co., 351 So.2d 29 (Fla.1977); Brigbtwell v.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Wills v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1977
  2. Vining v. Avis Rent-A-Car Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1977
  3. Nicholas v. Miami Burglar Alarm Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1976
  4. Orlando Executive Park, Inc. v. PDRDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  5. Brightwell v. BeemSupreme Court of Florida · 1956

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API