Panati v. Booth

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

Josephine Panati, claiming to be the holder in due course of a certain promissory note — made by Charles S. A. Booth under date of November 1,1927, promising to pay $1,500 three months after date to the order of Julius Pannetti (Panati) at 4355 Frankford Avenue, Philadelphia, “as per contract,” and containing on the . back thereof the endorsement “Pay to the order of Josephine Panati [signed] Julius Pannetti,” — brought suit thereon in the municipal court of Philadelphia against the maker. The defendant filed an affidavit of defense; plaintiff took a rulo for judgment…