Bishop v. Conley
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUMMERS, Judge.
The appellant, James M. Bishop, filed a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus challenging the Department of Correction’s disciplinary ruling which increased his release eligibility date. The trial court dismissed appellant’s petition without an eviden-tiary hearing. From this dismissal, appellant now appeals contending that he is entitled to have his petition transferred to the Chancery Court of Davidson County as a petition for writ of certiorari.
• We affirm the trial court’s judgment of dismissal.
Appellant is incarcerated on multiple offenses including burglary,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Archer v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
- Fallin v. Knox County Board of CommissionersTennessee Supreme Court · 1983
- Brigham v. LackCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1988
- Slagle v. ReynoldsTennessee Supreme Court · 1992
3Cited by42 opinions
- Willis v. Tennessee Department of CorrectionTennessee Supreme Court · 2003
- Rhoden v. State Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
- Robinson v. ClementCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
- Hawkins v. Tennessee Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2002
- Bonner v. Tennessee Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.