Claim of Hutchinson v. Fahs-Rolston Paving Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Spain, J.
Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed July 24, 2000, which ruled that Fahs-Rolston Paving Company was solely liable for workers’ compensation benefits paid to claimant.
Claimant was an employee of Fahs-Rolston Paving Company in 1994 when it began work as the general contractor on a highway construction project on Interstate Route 81 in Broome County. One of the jobs involved in the project was the removal of old concrete from bridge decks, for which hydrodemolition machinery was used. Fahs-Rolston did not own this equipment so it subcontracted with Flow…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Thompson v. Grumman Aerospace Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Claim of Shoemaker v. Manpower, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- 3092 Realty Corp. v. CallawayNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Claim of Johnson v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- In re the Claim of Quick v. Steuben County Self-Insurance PlanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wolfe v. KLR Mechanical, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Claim of Rosato v. Thunderbird Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Ribeiro v. Dynamic Painting Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Sherman v. Reynolds Metals Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Union Light & Power Co. v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.