Legal Opinion

Prest v. Ross

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 25, 1923PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBraley, J.

The plaintiff owns and occupies as a dwelling house the premises numbered 165 on Bay State Road, while the defendant owns the premises numbered 167 and 169. The houses are built on substantially similar plans, each house having on every story, except the basement and attic, a "bay window in front and in the rear. The several estates were subject to certain restrictions created by a common grantor which the master states “ were imposed for the purpose of establishing a fine residential district,” and so far as material they are as follows:

“ 1st — No buildings other than dwelling-houses (which…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Sawyer v. DavisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
  2. Stevens v. Rockport Granite Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  3. Wyeth v. Board of Health of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  4. Barry v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
  5. Carr v. RileyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hakkila v. Old Colony Broken Stone & Concrete Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  2. Strachan v. Beacon Oil Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  3. Gardner v. International Shoe Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Jenney v. HynesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  5. Ferriter v. HerlihyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API