State v. Barnett
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtDonofrio, J.
{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, the State of Ohio, appeals from a Mahoning County Common Pleas Court judgment granting a motion to suppress evidence obtained when officers of the Youngstown Police Department impounded and subsequently searched the vehicle of defendant-appellee, Rufus Barnett.
{¶ 2} The facts in this case are undisputed. Officers Savnik and Caraway from the Youngstown Police Department were patrolling the south side of the city of Youngstown on October 11, 2016. Around 1:00 a.m., Officers Savnik and Caraway began to follow appellee's car as it was traveling down Oak Hill Avenue (Oak…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- State v. BurnsideOhio Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. AwanOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- Heien v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Ohio v. FreemanOhio Supreme Court · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. WerderOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- State v. PowellOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
- State v. RisnerOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- State v. BryantOhio Court of Appeals · 2026
- State v. SkidmoreOhio Court of Appeals · 2023