Beckwith v. Town of Boylston
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.
This is an action to recover for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff while travelling on Melrose Street, a public way in Boylston in this Commonwealth. The case was referred to an auditor under a rule which provided that the auditor’s report should be final as to the facts found. The report in these circumstances constitutes in substance by previous agreement of the parties “a statement of all the ultimate facts upon which the rights of the parties are to be determined by law.” It becomes in effect a case stated. Merrimac Chemical Co. v. Moore, 279 Mass. 147, 152. G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Merrimac Chemical Co. v. MooreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- Kelly v. Inhabitants of BlackstoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
- Urquhart v. Smith & Anthony Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
- McGuinness v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
- George v. City of MaldenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Raymond v. DaviesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Barton v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Elwell v. Town of AtholMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
- Norman v. BarnesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Dery v. BoisvertMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1945