Legal Opinion

Freeland v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 19, 2002No. 1D02-1075PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

832 So.2d 923 (2002)

Matthew J. FREELAND, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D02-1075.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

December 19, 2002.

Fred M. Johnson, Fuller, Johnson, and Farrell, PA., Tallahassee for Appellant.

Richard E. Doran, Attorney General; Alan R. Dakan, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

2Per curiam

The registration and reporting requirements of Section 943.0435, Florida Statutes (2000) are regulatory and procedural in nature and do not violate the ex post facto clause. See Simmons v. State, 753 So.2d 762 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (holding that section…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Westerheide v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  2. Simmons v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  3. Rickman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  4. Gonzalez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  5. Hilton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. Givens v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  2. Boyer v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  3. Price v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  4. Florida Department of Law Enforcement v. Angel GarciaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2026
  5. Leitsch v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API