Legal Opinion

Hammer, Murray

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 8, 2009No. PD-0786-08Published

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. PD-0786-08 MURRAY HAMMER, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS WILSON COUNTY C OCHRAN, J., delivered the opinion of the unanimous Court. OPINION Appellant claims that the court of appeals erred when it held that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in excluding evidence that the complainant in this prosecution for indecency with a child had previously made a false accusation of “rape.” 1 We agree with 1 Hammer v. State,

256 S.W.3d 391

(Tex. App.—San Antonio 2008).…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. United States v. SchefferSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. McFarland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  5. Conner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API