Legal Opinion

Stanfield v. Stanfield

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 8, 1960No. 38557Published

1Opinion of the Court

350 P.2d 261 (1960)

Wilma Dean STANFIELD, Plaintiff in Error,

v.

James A. STANFIELD, Defendant in Error.

No. 38557.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

March 8, 1960.

Ungerman, Grabel, Ungerman, Leiter & Unruh, Imogene H. Harris, Tulsa, for plaintiff in error.

Finch & Finch, Sapulpa, for defendant in error.

WILLIAMS, Vice Chief Justice.

The parties are referred to as they appeared in the trial court. Plaintiff, the husband, obtained a divorce from defendant in 1950. Custody of the two minor daughters of the parties was awarded to their father (plaintiff).

In 1958 defendant filed this motion to modify the divorce…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jackson v. JacksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
  2. Stanfield v. StanfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  3. Bradford v. BradfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  4. Culbertson v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
  5. Blake v. BlakeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API