Legal Opinion
Fireison v. Pearson
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided January 22, 1987No. 84-157Published
1Opinion of the Court
520 A.2d 1046 (1987)
Louis FIREISON and Bernadine Fireison, Appellants,
v.
Luvie M. PEARSON, Appellee.
No. 84-157.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
Decided January 22, 1987.
Michael Alan Olshonsky, with whom Mary P. Nyiri, Washington, D.C., was on brief, for appellants.
Kenneth J. Ingram, Washington, D.C., for appellee.
Before MACK, BELSON and ROGERS, Associate Judges.
2Per curiam 1
Upon consideration of appellee's petition for rehearing en banc, the division sua sponte grants reconsideration. Having concluded that the rule of Piper v. Jenkins, 207 Md. 308, 314, 113 A.2d 919, 922 (1955) (if "the means of…
Also in this document: Dissent; Per curiam 2.
3Cases cited46 opinions
- M. A. P. v. RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
- Meredith v. Winter HavenSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Follette v. BurgosSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Shappirio v. GoldbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Marshall v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.