State of Missouri v. Justin Floyd Eugene Jones
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
OPINION CONCURRING IN PART AND DISSENTING IN PART
George W. Draper III, Judge .
T concur in the principal opinion’s holding that the Circuit court did not err by overruling Justin Floyd Eugene Jones’ (hereinafter, “Jones”) motion for judgment of acquittal on the charge of resisting arrest and Jones’ motion for a continuance. I respectfully dissent, however, from the principal opinion’s holding that'there was sufficient evidence upon which a jury could find beyond a reasonable doubt that Jones was guilty of committing armed criminal action during the course of the burglary of C.H.’s home. I…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. PigquesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
- State v. WhitakerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
- State v. CooperSupreme Court of Missouri · 2007
- State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
- State v. CollinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.