Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State of Missouri v. Justin Floyd Eugene Jones

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided January 26, 2016No. SC94924Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

OPINION CONCURRING IN PART AND DISSENTING IN PART

George W. Draper III, Judge .

T concur in the principal opinion’s holding that the Circuit court did not err by overruling Justin Floyd Eugene Jones’ (hereinafter, “Jones”) motion for judgment of acquittal on the charge of resisting arrest and Jones’ motion for a continuance. I respectfully dissent, however, from the principal opinion’s holding that'there was sufficient evidence upon which a jury could find beyond a reasonable doubt that Jones was guilty of committing armed criminal action during the course of the burglary of C.H.’s home. I…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. PigquesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  2. State v. WhitakerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  3. State v. CooperSupreme Court of Missouri · 2007
  4. State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  5. State v. CollinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API