In re D.F., H.F., M.F. and D.F., Juveniles
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.
¶ 1. Father appeals termination of his parental rights to his four children. On appeal, father raises three arguments regarding the court's termination decision: (1) the termination of parental rights (TPR) petition was premature because the three-month period for reunification provided for in the case plan had not expired and the Department for Children and Families (DCF) had not made reasonable efforts to reunify father with the children insofar as it refused to make the children available for expanded visitation that would have enabled reunification to occur; (2) the evidence does not…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In re A.F.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1993
- In re S.B.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2002
- In re C. P.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2012
- In re J.B.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1998
- In re B.W.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In re N.L., JuvenileSupreme Court of Vermont · 2019
- In re C.B., JuvenileSupreme Court of Vermont · 2020
- In re M.E., JuvenileSupreme Court of Vermont · 2019
- State v. Shannon HustonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2020
- In Re A.D. & A.D., JuvenilesSupreme Court of Vermont · 2024
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.