Johnson v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MANNHEIMER, Judge.
Michael J. Johnson appeals his conviction for felony driving under the influence. 1 He first contends that the evidence presented at his trial was legally insufficient to prove that he was under the influence at the time he operated the vehicle (as opposed to later, after the police stopped him).
At trial, Johnson testified that, during the approximately three minutes between the time the police pulled him over and the time they ordered him out of the car, he was surreptitiously taking drinks from a bottle of vodka. Johnson attributed his poor performance on the field…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Brewer v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Benjamin Adams v. Midge Carroll, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- William Howard Cross, Sr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- Dorman v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Gary N. Fields v. Edward W. Murray, Director, Virginia Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. DarbyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2009
- Korakanh Phornsavanh v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2021
- Steven Michael Hinshaw v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2022
- Christopher R. Stacy v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2021
- Coleman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2017
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.