Legal Opinion

Green v. Iredell

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 2, 1889PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Before Kershaw, J., Richland, April, 1888. For a full statement of the case upon matters not stated in the opinions here, see Green v. Iredell, 26 S. C., 553.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mr. Justioe MoGowan.

This case has been here before. See Green v. Iredell, 26 S. C., 558, where the facts are fully given. Among other things, it is there stated “that the appellants (C. J. Iredell and D. C. Peixotto), as arbitrators and attorneys in fact, sold the property and settled so much as was trust estate, but it seems that there was still left in their hands $351.89 of the individual estate of Dr. F. W. Green, and the action was brought to recover it from them as money had and received to the use of the plaintiff, Sarah Green, the sole legatee…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nye v. Bill Nye Milling Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Rowell v. HyattSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1917
  3. Stoefen v. BrooksSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API