Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Juan Rivera-Constantino

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 19, 2015No. 14-10314Published

1DissentPaez, Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent. The majority attempts to distinguish United States v. Garcia-Santana, 774 F.3d 528 (9th Cir.2014), and to sidestep the Taylor1 categorical approach to hold that a conspiracy conviction under 21 U.S.C. § 846 qualifies categorically as a drug trafficking offense, warranting the sixteen-level enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(i). Because I would follow Garcia-Santana, I would hold that where a prior conspiracy conviction under § 846 does not require proof of an overt act, it does not qualify categorically as a drug trafficking offense for purposes of the §…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. ShabaniSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Estrada-Espinoza v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. Pedro Jose Hernandez-Cruz v. Eric H. Holder Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. United States v. Leal-VegaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  5. United States v. Jesus Rodriguez-EscarenoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API