The People v. . the N.Y.C.R.R. Co.
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The stipulation between the parties, by means of which the application for a further allowance for costs was postponed until after judgment, contained a reservation of the rights of the respective parties. The right to a review was fairly included in this reservation, and that was possibly the motive for entering into the stipulation. But by postponing the application until after judgment, it was impossible to include the order for the further allowance in the…
2Cited by47 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Fletcher v. District CourtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
- Howell v. . MillsNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Tracy v. . First National Bank of SelmaNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
- Tilton v. BeecherNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- People v. HaasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.