Legal Opinion

Bennett v. Conant

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 15, 1852PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Bill in equity to redeem a mortgage. The material facta sufficiently appear in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, C. J.

This is a bill in equity to redeem a mortgage, *164made by the complainant to Jacob Conant; and the defence is, that the right of redemption has been foreclosed. The statement of facts seems somewhat complicated, by the introduction of facts, not in our opinion material to the issue.

It may be sufficient to state, that Thomas Bennett, the complainant, on the 28th April, 1838, mortgaged to Jacob Conant, all the Beals property so called; also, the Bennett property so called, consisting of lands and mills, situated about three miles from the Beals property, that these were embraced in one and the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Thayer v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1821

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Silva v. Commonwealth of MassachusettsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
  2. Araserv, Inc. v. Bay State Harness Horse Racing & Breeding Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1977
  3. Charlestown Holdings, Inc. v. Federal Deposit Insurance (In re Competrol Acquisition Partnership, L.P.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 1994
  4. Emigrant Mortgage Company, Inc. v. BourkeDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API