Legal Opinion

City of Bolivar v. Lacy

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 30, 2004No. 25808PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

KENNETH W. SHRUM, Judge.

A jury found Jack L. Lacy (“Appellant”) violated a municipal ordinance of the City of Bolivar (“City”). Appellant was fined and he now appeals. He urges reversal for two reasons: First, he claims City failed to prove the existence and terms of the ordinance he allegedly violated, and second, he argues City failed to adduce sufficient evidence to support a finding that he violated the ordinance. We disagree. We affirm.

FACTS

Appellant was found guilty of violating section 225.670 of City’s municipal ordinances, namely, that Appellant interfered with, hindered, or…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Consumer Contact Co. v. State Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  2. State v. HuettSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  3. City of St. Louis v. RocheSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  4. City of Kansas City v. NarronMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Rankin v. Venator Group Retail, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. City of Skidmore, Missouri v. Rickie L. StantonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API