Sinclair v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Ho statement is necessary.
1Opinion
This case was reversed at a previous day of this term, and now comes before us on rehearing. We do not understand the State to seriously contend that the case should be affirmed, inasmuch as it appears to be conceded that the court's charge on the question of agency, especially in applying the law to the facts, is erroneous. However, the State does insist that the court's discussion of the act of the Twenty-seventh Legislature, p. 262, is dicta. On a review of the case we are inclined to agree with this contention, inasmuch as the facts of the case do not bring it either under the head of a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bruce v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
- L. H. Woods & Co. v. Half, Weiss & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1876
- Rohrbough v. Leopold Bros. & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1887
- Bogle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1900
- Freshman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897