Legal Opinion

Sinclair v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 25, 1903No. 2709Published

Ho statement is necessary.

1Opinion

This case was reversed at a previous day of this term, and now comes before us on rehearing. We do not understand the State to seriously contend that the case should be affirmed, inasmuch as it appears to be conceded that the court's charge on the question of agency, especially in applying the law to the facts, is erroneous. However, the State does insist that the court's discussion of the act of the Twenty-seventh Legislature, p. 262, is dicta. On a review of the case we are inclined to agree with this contention, inasmuch as the facts of the case do not bring it either under the head of a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bruce v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
  2. L. H. Woods & Co. v. Half, Weiss & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Rohrbough v. Leopold Bros. & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Bogle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1900
  5. Freshman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API